In 2008manaloplay, Nate Silver’s election forecast model was so novel — and accurate — that it landed him on Time magazine’s list of the 100 most influential people the next year.

These days, election forecasts — which use data including polling, historical results and economic factors to predict the likelihood of an election outcome — are much more commonplace. There were at least 10 major forecasters this election cycle, though you could also find forecasts produced by high school statistics classes and Reddit users. (The New York Times has not published a pre-election forecast since 2016.)

While election polling has been around for more than a century, election forecasts have come to the forefront only in the past decade and a half. And while polls are intended to provide a snapshot in time, taking the pulse of how Americans are feeling about a race, forecasts go a step further, analyzing the polling and other data to make a prediction about who is most likely to win, and how likely.

slots city casino

But this year, with the polls already showing a razor-thin presidential race, the forecasts often indicated that the race was tied nationally or in swing states, or they gave one candidate or the other only a slight edge.

A Mixed Bag of Predictions

With the polls indicating a close race, forecasters’ models also suggested a tossup.

Three forecasters that gave Harris a 50 percent likelihood of winning gave Trump slightly less than 50 percent.

Source: Data collected by Scott Tranter and The New York Times

By The New York Times

These results raise the question: What is the value of these election forecasts? Proponents say they help synthesize the available information and that more data is better than less. They also argue that the forecasts this year performed well, generally — capturing the uncertainty of a close race, while holding out for the possibility that Donald J. Trump could sweep the swing states, as he did.

We are having trouble retrieving the article content.

Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.

More bleak headlines follow: “Bidenomics FAILED.” “Bidenomics is a RECORD FAILURE.” “Americans’ incomes down THREE STRAIGHT YEARS.” “Unemployment RISING.” “America may soon be in a RECESSION.”

United States Magistrate Judge Ryon M. McCabe, of the Federal District Court in West Palm Beach, Fla., granted the government’s request on Monday to keep the suspect, Ryan W. Routh, in jail without bond. So far, Mr. Routh has been charged with unlawful possession of a firearm as a felon, which carries a penalty of up to 15 years in prison, and with possession of a firearm with an obliterated serial number.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access.

Already a subscriber? Log in.

Want all of The Times? Subscribe.manaloplay